Compare
tracing.tools vs Datafast
Both attribute revenue without cookies. The difference is what you can ask.
Datafast and tracing.tools start from the same idea: analytics that knows which visitor paid, without a cookie banner. tracing.tools adds a copilot that answers questions in plain language, keeps the API and export on every paid plan, and stores everything in the EU.
Ask instead of filtering
Both dashboards show the same kind of numbers. On tracing.tools you can also type “which campaign earned the most this month?” and get the answer read straight from your data, with the figures it used.
Export and API on every paid plan
Raw events, the REST API, CSV export and the MCP server come with Pro. You are never asked to upgrade to get your own data out.
Stored in the EU
Events are collected at the edge near the visitor and stored in the European Union, with the retention window published for every plan.
Side by side with Datafast
| tracing.tools | Datafast | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue attribution built in | ||
| Fully cookieless, no consent banner | ||
| Ask questions in plain language | ||
| Script size | 1.4 kB | 2 kB |
| Real-time dashboard | ||
| Raw event export / API | Paid | |
| Data residency in the EU | ||
| Data sampling | Never | Never |
Ship the tag, ask the question
Free up to 5k events a month, forever. Two minutes and one line of HTML. No cookie banner, ever.